Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community (quality)"
CaboosePlays (talk | contribs) (Saxxy and Memory Maker ideas) |
CaboosePlays (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Also, the creators of the entries spend time and effort making the entries for the community to see and to get something worth the effort | Also, the creators of the entries spend time and effort making the entries for the community to see and to get something worth the effort | ||
I see that they are mementos of how far there effort has gone and they should be not just Unique but Community because its for the community. | I see that they are mementos of how far there effort has gone and they should be not just Unique but Community because its for the community. | ||
| + | I hope people read this and think its a fair point. Thanks | ||
--[[User:CaboosePlays|CaboosePlays]] ([[User talk:CaboosePlays|talk]]) 10:46, 5 October 2014 (PDT) | --[[User:CaboosePlays|CaboosePlays]] ([[User talk:CaboosePlays|talk]]) 10:46, 5 October 2014 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 5 October 2014
Honestly I've been thinking about the Saxxy's and i thought "Why aren't the Memory Maker and Saxxy Community quality?"" The Saxxy award entries are made for the community, made by the community and voted on by the community. It seems logical since the above opinion says everything is related to the community. Also, the creators of the entries spend time and effort making the entries for the community to see and to get something worth the effort I see that they are mementos of how far there effort has gone and they should be not just Unique but Community because its for the community. I hope people read this and think its a fair point. Thanks --CaboosePlays (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2014 (PDT)
