Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community (quality)"
(→เทคนิค Basic ของ Scout: new section) |
GrampaSwood (talk | contribs) m (→The list section) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: This sort of question would belong on the Steam forums rather than here. The discussion pages are meant for the article itself, not ideas about the item. [[User:Ashes|Ashes]] ([[User talk:Ashes|talk]]) 10:52, 5 October 2014 (PDT) | : This sort of question would belong on the Steam forums rather than here. The discussion pages are meant for the article itself, not ideas about the item. [[User:Ashes|Ashes]] ([[User talk:Ashes|talk]]) 10:52, 5 October 2014 (PDT) | ||
| − | == | + | == The list section == |
| − | + | I think the Lists section of this article should be renamed to See also and moved under the Gallery section. -[[User:Lord of Dominating|Lord of Dominating]] ([[User talk:Lord of Dominating|talk]]) 11:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC) | |
| − | + | :Hmm make sense, but I think the fact that almost all community quality items are given for a reason, it should be in a place better than see also, as it is a part of it not separated. Just my opinion, though changing to see also is probably better for maintance. [[User:Profiteer|Profiteer（奸商）the tryhard]] ([[User talk:Profiteer|talk]]) 12:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ::Either way is fine, they're a bit more relevant than a "see also" section.<br>[[File:BLU Wiki Cap.png|20px|link=List of Wiki Cap owners]] | [[Help:Group rights|<span style="color:green;font-family:TF2 Build;">s</span>]] | [[User:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">GrampaSwood</font>]] [[File:PraisetheSun.png|20px|alt=Praise the Sun!]] ([[User talk:GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">talk</font>]]) ([[Special:Contributions/GrampaSwood|<font color="DB9C1F">contribs</font>]]) 13:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 13:09, 28 December 2023
Honestly I've been thinking about the Saxxy's and i thought "Why aren't the Memory Maker and Saxxy Community quality?"" The Saxxy award entries are made for the community, made by the community and voted on by the community. It seems logical since the above opinion says everything is related to the community. Also, the creators of the entries spend time and effort making the entries for the community to see and to get something worth the effort I see that they are mementos of how far there effort has gone and they should be not just Unique but Community because its for the community. I hope people read this and think its a fair point. Thanks --CaboosePlays (talk) 10:46, 5 October 2014 (PDT)
- This sort of question would belong on the Steam forums rather than here. The discussion pages are meant for the article itself, not ideas about the item. Ashes (talk) 10:52, 5 October 2014 (PDT)
The list section
I think the Lists section of this article should be renamed to See also and moved under the Gallery section. -Lord of Dominating (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm make sense, but I think the fact that almost all community quality items are given for a reason, it should be in a place better than see also, as it is a part of it not separated. Just my opinion, though changing to see also is probably better for maintance. Profiteer（奸商）the tryhard (talk) 12:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Either way is fine, they're a bit more relevant than a "see also" section.
| s | GrampaSwood 
(talk) (contribs) 13:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Either way is fine, they're a bit more relevant than a "see also" section.
