Difference between revisions of "Talk:Community Medic strategy"

From Team Fortress Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(No mention of the battle medic?)
m (No mention of the battle medic?: Added substitution, added the time and date of an unsigned comment.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== No mention of the battle medic? ==
 
== No mention of the battle medic? ==
I think we should at least have a section on battle medics, as it is a play style that is used by many players. Not having a section on it is kind of turning a blind eye to a common occurrence, so i think it should be mentioned, possibly in the advanced strategies section. {{unsigned|Nk 170}}
+
I think we should at least have a section on battle medics, as it is a play style that is used by many players. Not having a section on it is kind of turning a blind eye to a common occurrence, so i think it should be mentioned, possibly in the advanced strategies section. <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:Nk 170|Nk 170]]''' ([[User talk:Nk 170|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/Nk 170|contribs]]) 2010-11-13T10:18:05</small>
  
 
:I added a section on battle medics. It's far from complete, so it needs a little work. --[[User:Flying Pyro|Flying Pyro]] 20:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 
:I added a section on battle medics. It's far from complete, so it needs a little work. --[[User:Flying Pyro|Flying Pyro]] 20:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:45, 4 July 2011

No mention of the battle medic?

I think we should at least have a section on battle medics, as it is a play style that is used by many players. Not having a section on it is kind of turning a blind eye to a common occurrence, so i think it should be mentioned, possibly in the advanced strategies section. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nk 170 (talk) • (contribs) 2010-11-13T10:18:05

I added a section on battle medics. It's far from complete, so it needs a little work. --Flying Pyro 20:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Map-specific ubercharge strategy

I think it's a good idea in concept, but the way it's turned out, it just looks like a list of chokepoints and defensible locations for only two maps -- Dustbowl and Gravel Pit. I'd suggest scrapping the section altogether; it's much more efficient to just look up a map and read up on the chokepoints. --Szthesquid 19:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Complete Revision

I am currently in the process of going through this entire article and cleaning it up (trimming it down, removing redundancies, making it entirely third person, making it easier to understand, etc). So far I've done the whole top section; if you see any errors there feel free to correct them. Wish me luck! Natemckn 21:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

I just did a general overhaul of the entire page. I was thinking of adding a Medic buddy section here, but there's already a Medic buddy page so I just left a link in the Combat Strategies section. --LordKelvin 17:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


Here's a thought.

Maybe you don't need to re-explain the specs of every weapon on these community pages, over and over. I could seriously reduce the size of these things by half.--Archdeco 20:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Uh, what? It's at most a single line under each weapon description. Four unlockable weapons, 4-8 lines of text? That's a hell of a lot less than half. --LordKelvin 21:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)