Team Fortress Wiki talk:Policies

From Team Fortress Wiki
Revision as of 15:51, 6 January 2024 by Tark (talk | contribs) (Usage of AI to assist in editing/creating content)
Jump to: navigation, search

Extension of the Mod notability section to the broader Community content notability concept

See User:Mikado282/Sandbox/Community content notability guidelines

Moved discussion to Team Fortress Wiki talk:Policies/Community content notability guidelines#Extension of the Mod notability section to the broader Community content notability concept

Error on "Deletion policy" see also.

It should be {{see also|wikipedia:Wikipedia:Deletion policy|l1=Wikipedia:Deletion policy}} and not {{see also|Wikipedia:Deletion policy|l1=Wikipedia:Deletion policy}}. Right now it looks like...:

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy

{{see also|Wikipedia:Deletion policy|l1=Wikipedia:Deletion policy}}


But it should be:

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy

{{see also|wikipedia:Wikipedia:Deletion policy|l1=Wikipedia:Deletion policy}}


At the moment, the current link goes to "Deletion policy" on Wikipedia, and not "Wikipedia:Deletion policy", which should be the correct page. User Gabrielwoj Signature Icon.png - User Gabrielwoj Signature 1.pngUser Gabrielwoj Signature 2.png - User Gabrielwoj Signature 3.png 14:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Pictogram tick.png Done Thanks for the heads-up. User Wookipan Golden Strawberry.png Wookipan (talk | contribs) 19:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Usage of AI to assist in editing/creating content

In a discussion on the -staff IRC channel, we already agreed that using AI to recreate voice lines (such as the Demopan quote on the Spanish Community fads page) should not be allowed. The usage of "AI" here is not actually artificial intelligence, but more akin to Google Translate. I propose we "officially" ban the usage of any sort of language model or "AI" image generator/enhancer, seeing as we ban the automatic translation of pages I don't see why we wouldn't ban the automatic generation of English-space content either.

Valve's official policy is that, unless you can prove you have the rights to everything the model is trained on, a game that uses anything "AI"-generated is not allowed on Steam. I think we should either copy this policy or straight up forbid the usage of it at all (I'm more in favour of a complete ban). (Also, this might seem targeted considering recent edits, but I didn't expect AI to be used more than once for the Wiki. It's not meant to be a targeted thing).
BLU Wiki Cap.png | s | GrampaSwood Praise the Sun! (talk) (contribs) 11:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

AI shouldn't be used for any form of content to Wiki full stop, it's not exactly known for its 100% accuracy in a lot of the things you ask of it, I'm not quite sure why a ban on AI isn't already in place.
Cheddar (talk) 11:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
For generative AI (AI that can make images, sounds etc.), I think following Valve's wish is the way to go. And since they own the original content (software), we can safely assume they're against using it for training.
For AI in general, like language models, banning it is a bit premature. We should avoid cases where smeone just asks it to write an article and calls it a day, but using it for assistance just like any other tool is completely acceptable imo.
(Also, the usage here would be quite different from, say, Wikipedia, but there are a few ongoing discussions there that we should probably refer to: 3 2 1.) — Tark 15:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)